Abstract:
Soil seed bank is both the genetic memory and the future in vegetation succession, and plays an
important role in revealing the mechanism in the recovery process of disturbed forests and in predicting its
successional direction. In order to reveal the role of soil seed bank in the process of forest restoration, and
to provide scientific basis and theoretical guidance for the management of subtropical secondary forests
and the development of artificial restoration techniques, the soil seed banks from secondary forests which
undertook different modes of harvesting and have recovered ever since, were analyzed. The comparisons
were conducted between forests naturally restored for 32 years after clear cutting (CC) or selective cutting (SC) in Tianjingshan Forest Farm, Guangdong, with noncutting (NC) evergreen broad-leaved forests in the
same area as controls. The distribution, density, species composition and diversity of the soil seed bank in
these three types of forest were investigated through vegetation surveys and soil seed germination
experiments, and the relationship between the soil seed bank and the above-ground vegetation was
analyzed. The results were as follows: (1) The seed banks of understory soils of different harvesting
methods were dominated by herbs, followed by shrubs and least by trees. The seed densities of trees and
shrubs were in the order of NC>CC>SC, with NC significantly higher than CC and SC (P<0.05), and there
was no significant difference between CC and SC; the seed densities of herbs were not significantly
different among different harvesting methods. (2) A total of 43 plant species were found in the soil seed
banks, most of which were light-damanded species, including 7 tree species (which were NC=CC>SC), 15
shrubs (which were NC>CC>SC), and 21 herbs (which were CC>NC>SC). (3) Shannon’s diversity index,
Simpson’s diversity index and Pielou’s evenness index of trees in the seed banks were in the order of
NC>CC>SC among different harvesting methods, the diversity indices and evenness indices of shrubs and
herbs were mostly not significantly different among different harvesting methods. (4) The similarity
between soil seed banks and vegetation was low in all investigated forests, with 4 shared tree species
including 3 in NC and 1 in SC, 2 shared shrub species, one each in SC and CC, and 1 shared herbaceous
species in NC. In conclusion, the seed density, number of species and diversity indices in the soil seed bank
after 32 years of natural recovery from logging in broadleaved evergreen forests are still smaller than those
in unharvested forests, the soil seed bank cannot support rapid natural recovery of disturbed forests.